Ebook A History of the Supreme Court, by Bernard Schwartz
Once again, checking out practice will consistently provide valuable perks for you. You could not should invest sometimes to check out guide A History Of The Supreme Court, By Bernard Schwartz Simply alloted a number of times in our extra or spare times while having meal or in your workplace to read. This A History Of The Supreme Court, By Bernard Schwartz will reveal you new thing that you can do now. It will certainly help you to enhance the high quality of your life. Occasion it is just an enjoyable e-book A History Of The Supreme Court, By Bernard Schwartz, you can be happier and much more fun to appreciate reading.
A History of the Supreme Court, by Bernard Schwartz
Ebook A History of the Supreme Court, by Bernard Schwartz
Discover the method of doing something from numerous resources. One of them is this book entitle A History Of The Supreme Court, By Bernard Schwartz It is a very well understood publication A History Of The Supreme Court, By Bernard Schwartz that can be referral to check out currently. This advised publication is among the all excellent A History Of The Supreme Court, By Bernard Schwartz collections that are in this site. You will additionally locate various other title and also themes from numerous authors to look right here.
Reading behavior will certainly constantly lead people not to completely satisfied reading A History Of The Supreme Court, By Bernard Schwartz, a publication, 10 e-book, hundreds books, as well as much more. One that will certainly make them really feel completely satisfied is finishing reading this e-book A History Of The Supreme Court, By Bernard Schwartz and obtaining the message of guides, after that finding the other following publication to review. It continues more as well as much more. The moment to finish checking out an e-book A History Of The Supreme Court, By Bernard Schwartz will certainly be always various depending upon spar time to spend; one instance is this A History Of The Supreme Court, By Bernard Schwartz
Now, exactly how do you know where to acquire this publication A History Of The Supreme Court, By Bernard Schwartz Don't bother, now you could not go to guide store under the bright sunlight or night to search guide A History Of The Supreme Court, By Bernard Schwartz We here consistently assist you to discover hundreds type of book. Among them is this book entitled A History Of The Supreme Court, By Bernard Schwartz You may go to the web link web page given in this set and after that opt for downloading and install. It will not take more times. Just attach to your internet access and also you can access guide A History Of The Supreme Court, By Bernard Schwartz online. Naturally, after downloading A History Of The Supreme Court, By Bernard Schwartz, you may not print it.
You can save the soft documents of this e-book A History Of The Supreme Court, By Bernard Schwartz It will certainly rely on your extra time as well as tasks to open and review this book A History Of The Supreme Court, By Bernard Schwartz soft data. So, you may not hesitate to bring this e-book A History Of The Supreme Court, By Bernard Schwartz almost everywhere you go. Just include this sot file to your gadget or computer disk to allow you check out every single time and all over you have time.
When the first Supreme Court convened in 1790, it was so ill-esteemed that its justices frequently resigned in favor of other pursuits. John Rutledge stepped down as Associate Justice to become a state judge in South Carolina; John Jay resigned as Chief Justice to run for Governor of New York; and Alexander Hamilton declined to replace Jay, pursuing a private law practice instead. As Bernard Schwartz shows in this landmark history, the Supreme Court has indeed travelled a long and interesting journey to its current preeminent place in American life.
In A History of the Supreme Court, Schwartz provides the finest, most comprehensive one-volume narrative ever published of our highest court. With impeccable scholarship and a clear, engaging style, he tells the story of the justices and their jurisprudence--and the influence the Court has had on American politics and society. With a keen ability to explain complex legal issues for the nonspecialist, he takes us through both the great and the undistinguished Courts of our nation's history. He provides insight into our foremost justices, such as John Marshall (who established judicial review in Marbury v. Madison, an outstanding display of political calculation as well as fine jurisprudence), Roger Taney (whose legacy has been overshadowed by Dred Scott v. Sanford), Oliver Wendell Holmes, Louis Brandeis, Benjamin Cardozo, and others. He draws on evidence such as personal letters and interviews to show how the court has worked, weaving narrative details into deft discussions of the developments in constitutional law. Schwartz also examines the operations of the court: until 1935, it met in a small room under the Senate--so cramped that the judges had to put on their robes in full view of the spectators. But when the new building was finally opened, one justice called it "almost bombastically pretentious," and another asked, "What are we supposed to do, ride in on nine elephants?" He includes fascinating asides, on the debate in the first Court, for instance, over the use of English-style wigs and gowns (the decision: gowns, no wigs); and on the day Oliver Wendell Holmes announced his resignation--the same day that Earl Warren, as a California District Attorney, argued his first case before the Court. The author brings the story right up to the present day, offering balanced analyses of the pivotal Warren Court and the Rehnquist Court through 1992 (including, of course, the arrival of Clarence Thomas).
In addition, he includes four special chapters on watershed cases: Dred Scott v. Sanford, Lochner v. New York, Brown v. Board of Education, and Roe v. Wade. Schwartz not only analyzes the impact of each of these epoch-making cases, he takes us behind the scenes, drawing on all available evidence to show how the justices debated the cases and how they settled on their opinions.
Bernard Schwartz is one of the most highly regarded scholars of the Supreme Court, author of dozens of books on the law, and winner of the American Bar Association's Silver Gavel Award. In this remarkable account, he provides the definitive one-volume account of our nation's highest court.
- Sales Rank: #68751 in Books
- Published on: 1995-02-23
- Original language: English
- Number of items: 1
- Dimensions: 6.13" h x 1.25" w x 9.25" l, 1.45 pounds
- Binding: Paperback
- 480 pages
Amazon.com Review
Bernard Schwartz's history treats the Court as "both a mirror and a motor--reflecting the development of the society which it serves and helping to move that society in the direction of the dominant jurisprudence of the day." Beginning with the 17th-century writings of Sir Edward Coke, which shaped much of the legal thinking of America's Founding Fathers, Schwartz considers each of the major eras of the Supreme Court's tenure, from its first term in 1790 (held in New York City) to the Rehnquist years. There are also four chapters that deal specifically with watershed cases: Dred Scott v. Sandford, Lochner v. New York, Brown v. Board of Education, and Roe v. Wade. Schwartz marshals a substantial amount of historical information to carry the story forward without getting stuck on minutiae.
From Publishers Weekly
Constitution scholar Schwartz ( Super Chief: Earl Warren and His Supreme Court ) provides a thorough, balanced and readable chronological overview of the highest court in the land. He mixes biographical sketches of justices like John Marshall with insightful analyses of major decisions, offering also a close look at four watershed cases, e.g., those regarding desegregation and abortion. Schwartz's account of the modern court, especially that headed by Warren, is lively and savvy, with a moderate-liberal slant. His history of the earlier court is less journalistic; nevertheless, he shows how the court slowly grew in role and stature, and how its decisions contributed vitally to an expanding federal economy and the rise of corporations. While Schwartz at times judiciously reevaluates scholarly controversies--such as his upgrade of long-denounced Dred Scott jurist Roger Taney--he skirts such issues as the growing argument that the right to abortion should be based on equal protection rather than privacy rights.
Copyright 1993 Reed Business Information, Inc.
Review
"Schwartz's book is not just for legal scholars; here he differentiates between the various Courts by chief justices, fleshing out the personalities, the scholastic backgrounds, and the philosophies of the jurists and giving law students and history buffs alike the lowdown on those who have shaped U.S. laws into the present....All the important cases, from Brown v. Board of Education to Roe vs. Wade, are explained in simple English. With its plain talk about complicated legal issues and its handy appendix, this book is a gem."--Booklist
"Excellent text!"--Charles C. Perkins, Fisher College
"This is a first-class history of the Supreme Court by an author who writes well, and it should provide a solid background for students who wish to study the Court rather than just read excerpts from opinions."--Dr. Robert W. Langran, Villanova University
"An excellent account of our still least-visible yet no longer least-dangerous branch of the national government. In what is the best one-volume history of the U.S. Supreme Court, Schwartz guides the reader on an impressive, informative journey through the court's work over its two centuries of existence....Schwartz's latest scholarly contribution to the literature of the Supreme Court is required reading, and not just for lawyers or law professors. Highly recommended."--Library Journal (starred review)
"A well-written account [that] takes us from the beginnings of the American judical system down to the present."--The New York Times Book Review
"A thorough, balanced, and readable chronological overview of the highest court in the land. He mixes biographical sketches of justices like John Marshall with insightful analyses of major decisions, offering also a close look at four watershed cases, e.g., those regarding desegregation and abortion. Schwartz's account of the modern court, especially that headed by Warren, is lively and savvy, with a moderate-liberal slant."--Publishers Weekly
"This compact yet comprehensive volume fills a special niche in writings about the Supreme Court and Constitutional law. Its detailed, yet manageable, information and analysis illuminate the critical role that the Court has played throughout U.S. history as the final arbiter of constitutional meaning and, hence, the ultimate guarantor of civil liberties and civil rights."--Nadine Strosser, Professor of Law, New York Law School, and President, American Civil Liberties Union
"Lots of writers have exhaustively mined the subject of judicial activism since Holmes's' appointment to the U.S. Supreme Court. Few Scholars have understood the nineteenth-century tradition from which twentieth-century activism emerged. Professor Schwartz has given us in twelve pages the most insightful, historically sound, intelligible analysis of the Dred Scott case ever written. Unlike mathematicians, there are no brilliant young writers; brilliant writers are old and experienced writers, and this is the crowning achievement of Professor Schwartz's long and distinguished career."--Richard Neely, Justice of the West Virginia Supreme Court of Appeals, author of How Courts Govern America
"Throughout our history, Justices of the Supreme Court have frequently affected our lives and fortunes to a greater extent than presidents and congresspersons. Bernard Schwartz has performed the monumental task of familiarizing us, in a readable manner, with the careers and works of those who served on the highest court in the land. The Schwartz Supreme Court history belongs in the library of all who seek to better understand our democratic way of life."--Stanley Mosk, Justice of the Supreme Court of California
"[An] elegantly written one-volume history....A lively narrative that springs to life through the introduction of key cases and colorful figures....Highly readable....It is, by far, the best one-volume history we have of the Court."--Kermit Hall, The Ohio State University
Most helpful customer reviews
20 of 21 people found the following review helpful.
Judges, Judgements, and Judicial Review
By Omer Belsky
Bernard Schwartz's "A History of the Supreme Court" is a readable if dry narrative of the 200 years of the Supreme Court between John Jay and William Rhenquist. The story of the supreme court is a complicated one, and for the most part, Schwartz tells it well. If his book is short on analysis and long on description, it is probably more due to the nature of the subject then to the qualities of the author.
Schwartz focuses on two main themes in the narrative. The first one, addressed in the Prologue and in the first few chapters, deal with the practice of Judicial Review in Anglo-Saxon common law, and especially in the early US, where under Chief Justice Marshall, the supreme court has been established as SUPREME - that is, in position to pass judgment on State legislators, State courts, and even the US Congress.
The theme is very prominent in the early history of the Court, where the Supreme Court fulfilled its Hamiltonian role as the final authority on the constitutionality of law. Very early, US Justices have proved that they were every bit the politicians as the Jurists - Chief Marshall successfully established Judicial Review in his Marbury vs. Madison decision, while Roger B Taney catastrophically endangered it in his attempt to end the political crisis of the Union via his Dred Scott Decision.
Later in the book, Schwartz still devotes time to the question of Judicial Review, but then in a new disguise - that of Judicial restraint, which Schwartz first sees in the actions of Roger B Taney, but which were only manifested plainly in the dissents of Oliver Wendell Holmes, most famously in the Lochner vs. New York case (1905), where the majority judges, led by Rufus W. Peckham, substituted its judgement to that of the legislative branch, and ruled a law restricting working hours unconstitutional (See Lochner v. New York: Economic Regulation on Trial). Under Judicial Restraint, the Supreme Court was only to overrule laws which no reasonable person could say were constitutional.
The other major theme in Schwartz's narrative is the switch from the primacy of property rights in the 19th century, to the supremacy of personal rights in the 20th. As the US came to allow much more government intervention in the economy, Schwartz argues, the rights of the private citizen, and especially the rights guaranteed in the bill of rights and the right of privacy had to be privileged. This tendency reached its climax in the Warren court, and particularly in the Brown vs. Board of Education decision. Surprisingly, though, the subsequent Burger court did not overthrow the trend. Rather, important personal rights rulings (such as Miranda) were affirmed, and even the right to abortion was guaranteed, as a right included within the right of privacy. The Rhenquist Court, though even more conservative then the Berger Court, has yet to turn the tables on Warren's revolution; indeed, the recent judgement against anti-Homosexual laws in Texas is another landmark civil rights decision.
Schwartz's book is interesting and thorough, but is not without flaws. The writing is somewhat crude, and Schwartz quotes other historians much too much. Schwartz has also an irritating tendency to use the same quote several times, and one quote from judge Frankfurter appears four times at least. The book also has the annoying tendency to assume all the readers are Americans.
Worse, sometimes Schwartz's scholarship is lacking. In the case of Dred Scott vs. Sandford, for example, Schwartz's makes no reference to the classic study by Don E. Fehernbacher (The Dred Scott Case: Its Significance in American Law and Politics), either in the text or in the bibliography. As a consequence, several of Schwartz's conclusion are somewhat distorted, and sometimes his views come out of the blue entirely. Thus Schwartz calls Stephen Douglas "the chief political victim of the Dred Scott Decision" [p.124] which is inaccurate and highly misleading. In the short run, Douglas's popularity in the South did not diminish after the Dred Scot decision, and when it did, it was due to his opposition to the Lecompton constitution - not to Dred Scott. In any event, Schwartz completely ignores the sectional split within the Democratic Party, a split that was indeed seemingly worsened by the Dred Scott decision, which abandoned ambiguity in favour of an endorsement of the Southern view.
Ultimately, Schwartz's book is both instructive and readable. If it is does not quite warrant a general endorsement, it is a good primer for those interested in American legal history.
9 of 10 people found the following review helpful.
Nothing else better -- for better or worse
By Dave. B.
Update: Since I wrote this review there have been several good books about the history of supreme court that have been written. Some, like Rehnquist's, might even be better. Still, none cover it all, and I believe that if you are interested in the history of court and want to read more than one or two books, this one should be on your list, even if it was written years ago. End of update.
I give five stars for three reasons. First, unlike many other legal histories it has few Latin phrases and most legal terms are explained. Second, the competition is multivolume tombs, most of which are very out dated, so this is by default the best book out there. Third, arguably, every major justice and case that shaped the philosophy of Constitutional Law is covered. It is remarkable that such long history can be meaningfully condensed into one book. It is an excellent reference to look up subjects that appear in books, news and current events. It is essential for understanding Constitutional Law.
For a faster read try skimming through some of the drier (or less well written) biographical descriptions, which are relatively easy to weed out. Schwartz covers some of the most interesting aspects of the early court when the Justices also served on the federal circuit court, spending as much as six months of the year traveling cross country under the most brutal conditions. Schwartz describes the evolution of Constitutional Law involving the struggle between the federal and state governments leading up to and after the Civil War. His coverage of Holmes during the development of the modern system of federal government is very good, although sometimes biased with Schwartz's liberal views. Schwartz goes into special detail for Civil Rights with chapters on Brown v. Board of Education and Roe v. Wade. Roe not only concerns abortion, it also establishes for the first time the Constitutionality of autonomy: the right to choose medical treatment, raise a family when and how you wish, as well as a right to shape your intellect and personality - and that is a fascinating read. While at times Schwartz carries on for a few pages about quarrels and politics that reveal little, he does get to the point, which is often worth the wait.
Criticism
As much as this book puts all the pieces together, it makes a lot more sense if you know some of the pieces first. If you have a special interest on a time period; Revolutionary period, Jacksonian Era, labor movement, Civil Rights or Constitutional Law, there are sections that are waiting for you.
While Schwartz does include surrounding events, he concentrates on the philosophy, particularly the development of liberal ideals in Constitutional Law. He even goes out of his way to criticize Richard Posner, a Federal Circuit Court Judge from the "Chicago-school" (economic law as part of curriculum) and prolific writer who has views every bit as conservative as Schwartz's views are liberal. An absence of political commentary would have made for a better history (not that I prefer Posner).
His history does reveal the undertones of political tug-of-war between Congress or the Executive against the Court, but he occasionally attributes events in history to the genus of certain justices rather than as a product of a complex process. This is particularly true with his description of Holmes, who is one of his heroes (and rightly so). In a period when there was little clarity in how to apply the Constitution to a giant expanding and industrializing country, the members of the court had to rely on their own personal experience and ethics for many decisions. While Holmes would make glorious arguments about the Constitutionality of his decisions, ultimately his conscience, and not the law, was his guide - a criticism that he had of his opponents.
The philosophy of the law, through a history of men and their deeds, is covered quite extensively, which makes this an important history of the Supreme Court despite my criticisms. This book is much less philosophical or convoluted than Morton H. Horwitz's The Transformation of American Law: 1870-1960 (not to be confused with the first volume, 1780-1860, which I highly recommend). I don't want Schwartz to have written a better book (well maybe a little better organized), what I want is for a modern legal historian to write a history of the Supreme Court using contemporary scholarship - a companion to Lawrence Friedman's A History of American Law 3rd edition. Besides, a lot has happened since 1993 and it is time for an update.
Readability rating: 6
Out of 10, two points off for vocabulary, two points off for excessive pontificating.
Most historical accounts written by lawyers are illegible to the layperson because of the spattering of French and Latin terminology, a frustration for anyone who did not spend a year in college learning legalese. Schwartz explains most of the legal terminology he use, but I still had to look things up, starting on page 6 with "general writ of assistance (its on the web)." And, Schwartz never uses one word when he can use two and he often seems to be quoting just for the sake of using a reference. He even quotes a review of one of his earlier works to support his argument, which is simply bad scholarship (p 269 n. 24). But, don't let this stop you, I rarely give any book more than an 8 unless it is a fantastic read -- and if I disliked it I would have given it a lower score.
Research Rating - moderate
Schwartz likes to write a lot before getting to the point, and sometimes the point is expressed in very long complex sentences. This makes hard to find good quotes. .
Footnotes are numerous but arranged in a the older Chicago Style. For instance, on page 437, "80. 112 S. Ct. at 2813-2814" refers to "Planned Parenthood v Casey, 1992", but you must carefully read three pages of notes figure this out. Also, notes are listed by chapter number, not chapter title or page, making it harder to find the note. .
The bibliography and index are excellent, and there is a separate case index.
While the book is packed with good and well researched information, much of it from original or primary sources, it is not always presented effectively or without bias.
9 of 10 people found the following review helpful.
Recommended for anyone interested in the Supreme Court
By A Customer
Prof. Schwartz' book is the best I have read on the subject to date, and as a Judge, I have a particular interest in the Supreme Court. Schwartz' writing flows, and his knowledge is second to none. I recommend this book to anyone even casually interested in the Supreme Court. He really brings this subject to life.
A History of the Supreme Court, by Bernard Schwartz PDF
A History of the Supreme Court, by Bernard Schwartz EPub
A History of the Supreme Court, by Bernard Schwartz Doc
A History of the Supreme Court, by Bernard Schwartz iBooks
A History of the Supreme Court, by Bernard Schwartz rtf
A History of the Supreme Court, by Bernard Schwartz Mobipocket
A History of the Supreme Court, by Bernard Schwartz Kindle
No comments:
Post a Comment